Subscribe to our Scholarship
Stay updated and be the first to receive JISS publications
Home / Policy Papers / Hamas
The American pressure against the Atarot housing project north of Jerusalem was likely meant to maintain the possibility of a two-state solution.
If three core principles are maintained.
As ever, Iran prefers to avoid direct involvement. But without its backing, support and expertise, the latest Hamas offensive against Israel would have been inconceivable.
What Happens When Hezbollah Seeks a Similar Arrangement of Quiet for Cash?
Israel’s Struggle against Hamas’s Indirect Approach
Neglecting IDF ground maneuver capabilities is a dangerous gamble.
The notion that Hamas could be incentivised by the injection of funds from Qatar has proven erroneous or deeply problematic.
It is in Israel's interest to solidify the Egyptian role in Gaza, in the context of "conflict management" as a governing policy concept. Egyptian participation in the efforts to stabilize the situation in Gaza serves as an important component in the vital Egypt-Israel relationship. It also helps erode Hamas' pretensions of Jihad.
The IDF's response will be harsher than usual, not because Israelis in the center are more valued than those in the periphery but because of the emerging need to show Hamas that it has grossly misjudged.
The challenge now is how to make it clear to the Hamas leadership that it should not believe is own supercilious words.
Reducing enemy capabilities and ambitions in Gaza requires Israeli military readiness and government willingness to use force intermittingly, while maintaining a healthy and resilient Israeli home front.
Although Hamas' cyber capabilities do not now constitute a serious threat to Israel, this reality can quickly change in view of the rapid pace of technological progress.
Accessibility Tools
- בניית אתרים