History, it seems, harbors a particular fondness for irony. Less than a century ago, the relationship between India and Europe was defined through the singular prism of colonialism. Britain, and in its wake Europe, viewed the subcontinent as the “Jewel in the Crown” — a resource for extraction, a source of cheap labor, and a captive market within a unilateral hierarchy of ruler and ruled. Yet, on January 27, the most striking historical reversal of the twenty-first century was completed: at the signing ceremony for the monumental trade agreement between India and the European Union, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen bestowed upon it the ambitious title, “the mother of all deals״.
The trade deal is far more than a mere economic contract; it is a declaration of a new world order. While the multilateral trading system stands under the growing threat of tariffs and geopolitical tensions, the current agreement proves that the era of free trade has not ended—it has simply transformed. Unlike the efficiency-driven agreements of the 1990s, which focused primarily on tariff reduction, the framework concluded in early 2026 was forged in the crucible of shifting geopolitical pressures and the critical need for national resilience in the face of global shocks.
It demonstrates how states are adapting to a reality in which liberalization is not disappearing, but becoming more selective and strategic. Rather than a retreat from globalization, what is unfolding is a search for bilateral arrangements with trusted partners that are redefining the balance of power between East and West.
After more than two decades of stalemate, negotiations between India and the European Union took a dramatic turn in 2025, driven primarily by the aggressive economic policy of the second Trump administration. Under the “America First” doctrine, Washington made it clear that the security and economic umbrella over Europe could no longer be taken for granted—a move perceived across the continent as a strategic abandonment that left it vulnerable to Russian influence.At the same time, U.S.–India relations hit a new low, as India found itself facing unprecedented tariffs of 50 percent — the highest in the world — including 25 percent in punitive duties for its continued Russian oil purchases. American frustration over Europe’s opposition to its claims of sovereignty in Greenland, combined with the economic pressure exerted on Delhi, created a unique set of geopolitical circumstances that pushed India and Europe to forge an alternative, unified economic front.
This reality compelled Brussels to demonstrate unprecedented flexibility on issues previously regarded as red lines, including judicial reforms and stringent environmental standards that New Delhi perceived as attempts to impose the European model on India. By early 2026, in light of reduced access to the American market and growing recognition that China represents a strategic risk, Europe was forced to recalculate its course. The understanding that India is not merely a destination market but an essential strategic pillar has turned the balance of dependence upside down.
On the practical front, the agreement provides significant economic benefits, reducing tariffs on 96.6% of EU goods exported to India. According to reports, this translates to annual savings of approximately €4 billion in duties on European products. In return, the European Union is also opening its market, reducing tariffs on 99.5% of goods imported from India. The trade deal is expected to bolster numerous sectors across both regions. European automakers, for instance, are poised to benefit as India has agreed to slash automotive tariffs from 110% to 10% over a five-year period, while establishing quota-based access for 250,000 EU vehicles annually. In exchange, the EU has granted immediate duty-free access to India’s labor-intensive exports, including textiles, apparel, leather, footwear, gems, and jewelry.
The services sector is also poised to be one of the major beneficiaries. The European Union has committed to opening 144 sub-sectors—particularly IT, professional services, and education—while facilitating enhanced labor mobility. Conversely, sensitive sectors such as dairy, grains, poultry, soy, and certain fruits and vegetables remain protected under the agreement. The deal is expected to provide a significant boost to India’s textile and apparel industry, which currently faces EU tariffs of up to 12%, compared to zero tariffs for competitors like Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Turkey. Similar advantages are anticipated for the export of chemicals, leather goods, and footwear.
The shift in the textile sector could also have profound implications for India’s rival, Pakistan, which stands to lose the export advantage it once enjoyed. This also applies to Bangladesh, which currently exports garments duty-free to Europe; its shipments will now face much stiffer competition. In Pakistan, officials have already sounded the alarm over the EU-India Free Trade Agreement, warning that it poses a “serious and immediate threat” to Pakistan’s industrial base, particularly the textile sector. Former Pakistani Economic Minister, Dr. Gohar Ejaz, stated that the “honeymoon period” of duty-free access that Pakistan previously enjoyed with the EU has come to an end, as the EU has now extended similar market access to India and other regional competitors. The EU-India trade deal could jeopardize $9 billion worth of Pakistani exports to the EU, most of which are textile-related. He warned that the consequences could be devastating for employment, with up to 10 million jobs at risk in the textile and allied industries. The former minister called the situation a “wake-up call,” emphasizing that the government must make immediate decisions to protect the local textile industry, noting that “to survive regional competition, the textile sector must be provided with electricity and gas at affordable rates”.
Within the framework of the agreement with the European Union, India has astutely protected its most sensitive sectors, led by agriculture and dairy, recognizing that exposure to import pressures would strike at the heart of its core national interests. No concessions were granted on import tariffs for dairy products, which join other protected agricultural categories such as rice, wheat, coffee, and tea. The exclusion of these sectors does not stem from a mere protectionist instinct, but rather from a strategic choice rooted in a deep socio-economic analysis: agriculture in India is the backbone of the rural economy and the livelihood for over 700 million people. Unlike the mechanized, corporate model of the West, Indian agriculture remains a fundamental means of subsistence and is thus defined as a matter of food security and political stability. This steadfast position sets a clear benchmark for future dialogues and is likely to remain unchanged even in the face of similar pressures from the United States.
The landmark trade deal provides an opportunity for the European Union to reduce its dependence on China. It also offers a way to mitigate risks within supply chains and secure access to India’s rapidly growing consumer market. This is expected to create growth opportunities for European companies in Asia amid relatively slow growth in domestic demand within the EU. The agreement effectively “locks in” India as a reliable alternative manufacturing hub for the West. This trade agreement could also provide a boost to critical infrastructure projects, such as the IMEC (India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor), which is perceived as an alternative to Beijing’s “Belt and Road” initiative. The corridor, starting at Mumbai’s ports and ending in Europe, is set to strengthen India’s role as the manufacturing hub of the “New World,” fulfilling the ruling party’s vision through initiatives like “Make in India” and guaranteeing Europe access to a market of 1.4 billion consumers hungry for innovation.
The India-EU agreement has direct and significant implications for Israel, primarily by serving as a critical growth engine for the IMEC corridor. Within this framework, the Port of Haifa becomes a strategic transit point. However, the current reality—where the port, owned by India’s Adani Group, suffers from losses and an ongoing conflict with the Ministry of Infrastructure—represents a barrier that must be removed.
This new agreement is a “wake-up call” for the Ministry of Infrastructure to accelerate national projects and realize the port’s inherent potential. Furthermore, Israel should explore integration into new supply chains by relocating production lines to India. Above all, this deal could serve as a catalyst to conclude the long-stalled Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations between Jerusalem and Delhi. We must internalize that if Europe, with all its complexities, managed to sign such an agreement, Israel cannot afford to lag behind and lose its relative advantage in the growing Indian market. Perhaps it is time to push for a significant announcement on this matter during Prime Minister Modi’s expected visit to Israel at the end of the month.
For Washington, the EU-India free trade agreement constitutes a strategic warning. Continued reliance on tariffs and economic unilateralism risks leaving the United States outside some of the most dynamic economic corridors in the world. The emerging economic bridge between India and Europe is intended to reduce dependence on the dollar and on the volatility of American foreign policy, and it appears to have already produced results. Just one week after signing the agreement with Brussels, President Trump and Prime Minister Modi announced a reciprocal trade arrangement following six months of discussions and tension, under which tariffs on India would be reduced from 50 percent to 18 percent.
The signed agreement is not merely another technical trade contract, but a formal recognition of India’s status as an equal strategic partner in the international system. It is a deal built on reciprocity rather than exploitation, and on technological synergy rather than the unilateral dictation of terms. Beyond its economic implications, this historic agreement symbolizes the crumbling of the final remnants of the colonial era, reaffirming the fact that the global economic center of gravity is shifting eastward.
On the geopolitical front, this move aligns perfectly with New Delhi’s doctrine of “multi-alignment”. India, seeking to avoid exclusive dependence on either the United States or Russia, finds in the European Union—the world’s largest trading bloc—a vital counterweight to pressure from Washington on one hand, and Beijing’s aggression on the other. This partnership allows India to establish itself as an independent and balanced power in the “big leagues”, fortifying the strategic autonomy of both itself and its partners
The establishment of this free trade agreement is thus a strategic necessity for both parties, forming part of a broader global effort to diversify supply chains and reduce reliance on single-source suppliers. At a time when global trade is becoming increasingly protectionist and rife with rivalries, the agreement provides an opportunity to reshape the architecture of global trade and strengthen economic resilience along the axis connecting Asia, Europe, and the Atlantic.
The ultimate balance of gains will depend on the ability of the parties to adapt to structural changes in the international political economy. While the agreement marks a milestone for India’s ambitions and the broader Asian export landscape, the path to full implementation still requires the completion of necessary procedural phases to transform the vision into a stable and resilient economic reality.
JISS Policy Papers are published through the generosity of the Greg Rosshandler Family.
