Soldiers in uniform for less time means the army has less time to train them and can make use of their skills for a shorter period. In addition, there is no benefit in releasing potential young workers early at a time of rife unemployment.
At the start of July, as the second wave of coronavirus engulfed Israel, a decision to shorten mandatory IDF service for men to 30 months took effect. In the past few years, a number of versions of shorter compulsory service have been tried: in June 2015 an amendment to the law cut four months off men’s mandatory time in the military, from three years to 32 months. In December 2016 a decision was made to cut more time off mandatory service, despite the chief of staff’s objection.
The main push for shortened service came from the Finance Ministry, whose functionaries argued that less time in the army meant that young workers would be available sooner, and help narrow the gap between those who serve and those who are exempt from service, like the Haredim or the Arabs. There is no doubt that Israel’s economic infrastructure is an important element to its security, and the defense budget must take economic considerations into account as much as possible. However, there will be no national economy unless the IDF can effectively counter the existential and non-existential challenges posed by Israel’s strategic surroundings.
There are major ramifications to shortening mandatory military service, including not-inconsiderable risks to national security. The first and clearest ramification is a reduction to the personnel available to the IDF. The military depends on soldiers serving their mandatory time as its main source of personnel, and already suffers from a shortage of people, especially in combat and tech units. These problems will only worsen if the compulsory service stint is shortened.
A modern army demands skills that take longer to acquire than army professions did in the past. This is true for combat units, and even more so for units in which the technology element requires lengthy study and training. Shortened service will give the army less time with those same soldiers in whom it invested time and money. The shortened service will increase the rate at which soldiers in sensitive roles are rotated out, causing a loss of experience and more clashes within the organization.
Shortening mandatory service does not carry with it enormous savings, certainly not at a time of economic crisis and massive unemployment. After the first cut to compulsory service time in 2018, there were soldiers who served an additional four months and were paid salaries of career army personnel. In addition, shortening service will increase the need to use reservists, especially for ongoing security operations. It costs much more to call up reservists than to deploy soldiers on mandatory service.
Proposals to cut mandatory time in uniform have already been made. One committee recommended that in February 2006. A few months later, the Second Lebanon War broke out and changed opinions on the matter. Indeed, unexpected security and defense incidents, which are to be expected in our area, demand greater caution in the IDF’s personnel policies. The age of peace has not yet arrived. At a time of potential for a wide-scale conflict – particularly given Iran’s stepped-up attempts to achieve military nuclear capabilities – the message Israel sends to both Israeli society and our enemies in the region by shortening mandatory service is the wrong one, and even dangerous.
Published in Israel Hayom 14.07.2020
JISS Policy Papers are published through the generosity of the Greg Rosshandler Family.